SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

K.S.VENKATARAMANI, P.K.DESAI
Manohar Bros (Capacitors) – Appellant
Versus
Collector of Customs-II, Bombay – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
N.R. Kantawala, A. V. Naik,K.M. Mondal, Krishnamurthy

ORDER

Per Shri P.K. Desai: Though all the Four appeals arise out of different Orders in original as indicated below, with the common issue involved, all of them have been argued together and are being disposed of by this Common order.

2. Appeal Nos. C/480/95, C/486/95 and C/491/95 are against the Orders-in-original CAO Nos. 53/95,54/95 and 62/95 of the Collector of Customs - II Bombay, whereas Appeal NO. C/1810/95 is against the Order-in-Original No. 36/cus/95 of the Collector - II of Central Excise & Customs at Pune.

3. All the Appellants engaged in manufacture of Power Capacitors, Imported Aluminium Foils containing more than 90% of Aluminium and paid the Customs Duty at the concessional rate vide Notification No. 345/96 dt. 16.6.1986. the foils so imported, which had suffered duty under concessional rate, had to be used in manufacture of Plastic Film Capacitors. On information received, investigations were carried out, which revealed that the foils so imported were issued in manufacture of Mixed Dielectric Capacitors and Bombay Customs also obtained opinion from prominent Institutions namely, The Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, The Indian Institute of Technology and The Electronic R

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top