SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

S.K.BHATNAGAR, S.L.PEERAN
Polychem Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Collector of Central Excise, Pune – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Gautam B. Doshi,Sharad Bhansali

ORDER

PerS.L. Peeran:

This appeal is directed against the order-in-original dt. 17.6.93 passed by the Collector of Central Excise, Pune.

2. In this order, the ld. Collector has drawn the following issues for his determination:

i. whether conditions of the Notification No. 53/88-CE dt. 1.3.88 as amended, are fulfilled;

ii. whether MODVAT Credit availed, on the duty paid VAM can be treated as duty paid or otherwise;

iii. whether company has an option to pay duty on their own in case the goods are fully exempted from payment of duty.

The ld. Collector has noted that the assessee had been availing duty concession under Notification No. 53/88-CE dt. 1st March'88 as amended, for their product 'Polynol' i.e. Polyvinyl Alcohol and using VAM, the raw material, captively for the same. In view of this fact, the assessees are not required to pay any duty on VAM. Moreover, they were entitled for duty exemption under Notification No. 217/86-CE dt. 2.4.86, they have preferred to forgo the exemption for captive consumption on VAM available under Notification No. 217/86-CE dt. 2.4.86 and to pay the duty, it has been further noted that the assessees were well aware of this fact, which can be seen from p


Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top