SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

P.V.REDDI, J.KHOSLA, V.K.SHRIDHAR
Bharati AXA General Insurance Co. Ltd. , In re – Appellant
Versus
– Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Rajan Vora, Anil Lukose, Manoneet Dalal,Ms. Meera Srivastava, Pankaj Kumar

RULING

Justice P.V. Reddi, Chairman. - The applicant (BAGI) is a company incorporated in India on 13-7-2007 to undertake the business of general insurance. AXA Asia Regional Centre Pvt. Ltd., (AXA ARC) is a company incorporated in Singapore and it is a part of the AXA group of companies. It acts as a Central service organization which caters to the requirements of AXA group companies in the region. The applicant entered into a Service Agreement with AXA ARC for receiving assistance such as business support, marketing information technology support services and strategy support etc., from AXA ARC. The applicant states that these services are merely advisory in nature and are procured with the intention of carrying on business in line with the best practices followed by other AXA group entities globally.

2. The applicant submits that the ‘services provided by AXA ARC are not “a one off transaction” but they are meant to support the applicant’s functioning on a continuous basis’. For providing these services no employee of AXA ARC will physically visit India. AXA ARC has no business establishment in India. The applicant has stated that for the services rendered by it, AXA ARC charges a

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top