Back
H.K.MUDGIL
Naresh Kumar Agarwal – Appellant
Versus
Deputy Director, Enforcement Directorate, Calcutta – Respondent
1. This is a remanded matter from the Hon'ble Calcutta High Court, titled as Naresh Kumar Agarwal v. Dy. Director, Enforcement Directorate [GA No.3432 of 2008, FEA No.26 of 2008, decided on 23.02.2010,wherein the Hon'ble Calcutta High Court had set aside the order of the Tribunal, dated 12.08.2008 pertaining to Appeal No.405 of 2003 and the matter was remanded for fresh hearing on fact and in law on the points (1) whether there has been a retraction of confessional statement or not (2) whether the respondent has been able to prove the case as per standard as required in a case like this. The aforesaid two things are required to decide the matter effectively. The Tribunal was further directed to decide the matter within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
2. It is pertinent to mention that the Registrar of this Tribunal putup the present matter before the Chairperson on 02.01.2014 for fixing the date of hearing & he (Registrar) reported that the Hon'ble High Court of Calcutta, vide its order, dated 23.2.2010 had remanded the matter back to this Tribunal for decision on merits within three months from the receipt of this order. The letter of
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
