SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

ASHOK CHAWLA, H.C.GUPTA, GEETA GOURI, ANURAG GOEL, M.L.TAYAL, S.N.DHINGRA
Shailesh Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Tata Chemicals Ltd. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Sharad Bhansali, Ms. Surbhi Mehta

1. The present information has been filed by Shri Shailesh Kumar ('the informant') under section 19(1)(a) of the Competition Act, 2002 ('the Act') against M/s Tata Chemicals Limited ('the opposite party No. 1'/TCL), M/s DCW Limited ('the opposite party No. 2'/DCW), M/s Gujarat Heavy Chemicals Limited ('the opposite party No. 3'/GHCL), M/s Nirma Limited ('the opposite party No. 4'/Nirma) and M/s Saurashtra Chemical Limited (the opposite party No. 5'/SCL) alleging inter alia contravention of the provisions of section 3 of the Act.

2. Shorn of details, facts, as stated in the information, may be briefly noted:

2.1 The informant alleged cartelization by the aforesaid enterprises in the market of manufacturing and sale of soda ash in India under the umbrella of Alkali Manufacturers Association of India (AMAI).

2.2 It was alleged that the opposite parties, under the aegis of AMAI, formed a cartel with a view to manipulate prices and volume of production of soda ash in India by sharing information relating to data on production, installed capacity, capacity utilization, capacity expansions including data on demand and supply, imports, exports, international prices in violation of the provisi

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top