SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

ASHOK CHAWLA, GEETA GOURI, ANURAG GOEL, M.L.TAYAL, S.N.DHINGRA, S.L.BUNKER
V. Senthilnathan – Appellant
Versus
United India Insurance Co. Ltd. – Respondent


1. OP 1 is a public sector general insurance company incorporated in 1938. It obtained the business of Mediclaim Insurance for the CanCard Holders under group insurance from the year 2005-06. Earlier, CanCard management utilized the services of M/s. New India Assurance Co. Ltd., New Delhi, for the same medi-claim insurance.

2. At the time of filing of the information, the Third Party Administrator for OP 1 was stated to be M/s. E-Meditak (TPA) Services Ltd. (OP 2). Prior to year 2005-06, the TPA for New India Assurance Co. Ltd was M/s. Medi Asst India (P) Ltd., Bangalore.

3. TPAs were introduced by Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority (IRDA) in the year 2001 to ensure better services to policy holders. Their basic role is to function as an intermediary between the insurer and the insured and facilitate cashless service at the time of hospitalization as well as processing of claims. Insurance companies, in order to improve the processing of claims, appoint TPAs, licensed by IRDA. The selection of TPAs from amongst the licensed rests with the Insurance Company and no criteria / procedures are specifically laid down for such selection by IRDA. The selection of TPAs and terms a

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top