Jyoti Swaroop Arora VS Tulip Infratech Ltd.

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

ASHOK CHAWLA, S.L.BUNKER, SUDHIR MITAL, AUGUSTINE PETER, U.C.NAHTA
Jyoti Swaroop Arora – Appellant
Versus
Tulip Infratech Ltd. – Respondent

Advocates Appeared:
Avinash Sharma, Anubhav Ray, Vivek Kohli, Lokesh Bhola, Gurukrishna Kumar, Rakesh Kumar, Bipin Kumar, Suresh Chandra Sharma, Amir Pasrich, Vikas Agarwal, Vaisayant Paliwal, Dhruv Malik, Manas Chaudhuri, Sagardeep Singh, Shounak Mitra, C.P. Kakarania, Deepak, Sanjiv Sen, Bharti J. Joshi, M.V. Durga Prasad, Dev Roy, G. Ramakrishna Prasad, Neha Sharma, Amit Dhulekar, Manish Sharma, Adrika Pandey, Rahul Dahiya, Yashpal Autil, Ranjan Sardana, Pradeep Verma, A.N. Haksar, K.A. Sampat, Aayushe, Anuj Puri, Satyendra Kumar, Kalyani Shukla, Gesu Priyadarshini, Amit Sibal, M.M. Sharma, Vaibhav Choskse, Deepika Rajpal, Vijay Nair, Manoranjan Sharma, V. Mohan, Krishnan Venugopal, Rahul Goel, Anu Monga, Neeraj Lalwani, Aditya Narain, Arnav Narain, Gaurav Ray, Sunil Raj R., S. John Vijay Kumar, Ramji Srinivasan, Manas Kumar Chaudhuri, Pranjal Prateek, Anand Somani, Aditya Sondhi, Nisha Kaur Uberoi, Aishwarya Gopalkrishnan, Neelambera Sandeepin, Pinaki Mishra, R. Chandrachud, Rajnish Singh, Devashish Bharuka, P.K. Mishhra, B.V. Karthik, Radhika Seth, Nihil Sahai, Rajeevan Nair, H.S. Chandhoke, Vardhan Tulsian, Deeksha Manchanda, Arjun Nihal Singh, Gauran Jain

ORDER

1. The present information under section 19(1)(a) of the Competition Act, 2002 ('the Act') was filed by Shri Jyoti Swaroop Arora ('the Informant') against M/s Tulip Infratech Ltd. ('the Opposite Party No. 1'/ OP-1), Director, Town & Country Planning Haryana ('the Opposite Party No. 2'/ OP-2) and Haryana Urban Development Authority ('the Opposite Party No. 3'/ OP-3) alleging inter alia contravention of the provisions of section 3 of the Act.

2. In the instant case, the Informant alleged that various enterprises engaged in real estate development business including the Opposite Party No.1 have an arrangement/ understanding amongst themselves to adopt an anti-competitive modus operandi/ practices. It was further alleged by the Informant that there is a tacit understanding amongst all the real estate players in the market. In support of this allegation, the Informant has referred to an article in the Economic Times of 14.11.2011 wherein Shri Pradeep Jain, Chairman of Confederation of Real Estate Developers' Association of India (CREDAI) was reported to have stated that all constituent members of CREDAI would be signing a Code of Conduct. As per the statement of Shri Jain, CREDAI Co

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

ASHOK CHAWLA, S.L.BUNKER, SUDHIR MITAL, AUGUSTINE PETER, U.C.NAHTAJyoti Swaroop Arora – AppellantVersusTulip Infratech Ltd. – Respondent

ASHOK CHAWLA, S.L.BUNKER, SUDHIR MITAL, AUGUSTINE PETER, U.C.NAHTA
Jyoti Swaroop Arora – Appellant
Versus
Tulip Infratech Ltd. – Respondent