SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

V.S.RAO
Amadhi Investments Ltd. , In re – Appellant
Versus
– Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
M.S. Bhardwaj, Ritish Tagde, M.V. Chakranarayan

ORDER

V.S. Rao Member. - The petitioner-company is a company registered with the Registrar of Companies, Maharashtra, having its registered office at Room No. 4, Thambai Co-operative Society, Sewri-Koliwada, Sewri(E), Mumbai. The company’s books of account and other records were inspected by the officers of Ministry of Corporate Affairs under section 209A. During the inspection some contraventions of the Companies Act have been identified by the inspecting officers. The company as per its statement has preferred suo motu application for compounding of its offences. Accordingly, the company submitted three applications along with its officers in default to the Registrar of Companies, Mumbai, for compounding of offences of violation of the Companies Act.

2. The Registrar of Companies, Maharashtra after examining the compounding application received under section 621A of the Companies Act, 1956, for contravention of the Companies Act, has forwarded the same to this Bench with his report which is as follows :

"This office has received an application under section 621A of the Companies Act, 1956, of compounding an offence under sections 81(1A) and 154, Schedule I, Table A, article 29 and S

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top