Back
B.S.V.PRAKASH KUMAR
Blancatex AG – Appellant
Versus
AI Champdany Constructions Ltd. – Respondent
Heard.
2. Respondent No. 5 filed these applications, C. A. No. 61 of 2010 and C.A. No. 63 of 2010 for modifying the order dated January 12, 2010, passed by the Principal Bench, Company Law Board at Delhi, relating to restraining respondent No. 5 from alienating or creating any third party rights with respect to fixed assets of Rampur Texpro Unit till the next date of hearing.
3. The applicant being respondent No. 5 in the main petitions, the respondents in this application being the petitioners in the main petitions, they are referred as arrayed in the main petitions. The Companies Act, 1956, for the sake of brevity, is referred as "the Act". The cause of action, the reliefs and the respondents in these two cases being the same, I pass a common order, instead of separate orders.
4. This Bench already passed an order on May 17, 2010, in these applications by placing the operative portion of the common order in the attendance sheets of this Bench in both the applications with a view to bring the operative portion of the order to the notice of the parties before correction of the order with reasons. Since the applicant herein perhaps remaining in the belief that the order in the att
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
