SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

ASHOK KUMAR TRIPATHI
Ms. Varshaben S. Trivedi – Appellant
Versus
Shree Sadguru Switch Gears (P. ) Ltd – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
R.T. Rajguroo, C.S. Bindi Vaishrav,J.I. Vyas

JUDGEMENT

1. The Petitioner has filed the present Company Petition under Section 397 and 398, read with Section 402 of the Companies Act, 1956 (hereinafter referred to as "Act" in short), complaining therein certain acts of oppression and mismanagement purportedly committed by the Respondent Nos.2 to 4 in the affairs of the Respondent No. 1 Company, The Petitioner has sought various reliefs as contained in the Petition.

2. Briefly the facts as set out in the Petition are as follows:-

2.1 The Respondent No. l is a Company incorporated under the Indian Companies Act in the State of Maharashtra and its registered office is situated at 10, Sakan Twins, Opposite Satellite Centre, Nehru Park, Vastrapur, Ahmedabad 380 015.

2.2 The Petitioner claims to hold 24,880 equity shares of Rs.10/- each, in the paid share capital of the company constituting 62.36% of the total shareholding of the Respondent No. l Company.

2.3 The Respondent No.2, holding only two shares of the Company, is the brother of the Respondent No.3 and he is alleged to be a Director of the Respondent No. l Company. The Respondent No.3 is the husband of the Respondent No.4, and he holds four shares of the company and is also shown

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top