Sudhir Agarwal J.—Heard Sri Ramendra Pratap Singh, Advocate for appellant and Sri S. Shekhar, Advocate for respondent.

2. This is a defendant’s appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure (hereinafter referred to as the “CPC”), which has arisen from the judgment dated 29.08.2002 and decree dated 05.09.2002 passed by Sri Rajbhan Singh, VIth Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), Ghaziabad in Original Suit No. 321 of 1992, whereby the court below has decreed suit and made a declaration that defendant-appellant is not entitled to recover 75% of auction money and interest thereon from plaintiff-respondent until it perform and complete the following works:

(Matter in other language)

“A. The community facility shown in the layout plan be not changed into commercial centre.

(Matter in other language)

B. The commercial centre be not fully developed.

(Matter in other language)

C. Till the time the unauthorised encroachment at the plot and in its vicinity is not removed.

(Matter in other language)

D. Communication facilities like telephone, telex and post office facility be not provided by the defendant.”

(English translation by the Court)

3. It has also direct