P.R.BORA
Vilas Trimbak Sanap – Appellant
Versus
Shriram Rajendera Sanap – Respondent
P.R. Bora, J.—Heard. The appellant has filed the present appeal against Judgment and Order dated 12th January, 2016 passed by District Judge1, Beed in Regular Civil Appeal No.50/2015.
2. The appellant had filed Regular Civil Suit No.499/2014 for partition against his father and brothers claiming his 1/4th share alleging that father and brothers had refused to give him his share in the suit properties. In the aforesaid suit, compromise took place between the parties and on the basis of the said compromise-deed, the aforesaid civil suit came to be decreed by the learned trial court.
3. Present Respondent Nos. 1 to 3, who were not party to the aforesaid suit, filed Regular Civil Appeal No. 50/2015 assailing the Judgment and Decree dated 29th December, 2014 passed by the Trial court. It was the contention of these respondents that along with the plaintiff and defendants in the subject suit, they also possess share in the suit properties and as such without their presence in the said suit, impugned decree could not have been passed merely on consent of the plaintiff and defendants therein.
The appellant appeared in the appeal filed by Respondent Nos. 1 to 3 and resisted the sam
Daljit Kaur and Anr. v. Muktar Steels Pvt. Ltd. and Ors.
Pushpa Devi Bhagat (dead) through L.r. Smt. Sadhana Rai v. Rajinder Singh and Ors.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.