AMAR SINGH CHAUHAN
Vakila – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent
Amar Singh Chauhan, J.—This criminal revision has been preferred against the judgement and order dated 24.9.2008, passed by the Judicial Magistrate-Ist Class, Baghpat in Case No. 986 of 2008 (Smt. Vakila and another vs. Isab Ali alias Bhura) under section 125 Cr.P.C., Police Station Baraut, District Baghpat whereby the application of the revisionist-applicant no. 1 Smt. Vakila moved under section 125 Cr.P.C. for maintenance, was rejected.
2. The facts which are requisite to be stated for adjudication of this revision are that an application under section 125 Cr.P.C. was moved by Smt. Vakila on behalf of herself and her minor daughter Km. Nargis on the ground that marriage of revisionist no. 1 and opposite party no. 2 was solemnized in the year 1983 in accordance with Muslim Rights and Customs in which 152.5 tola silver was fixed as Mehar. After the marriage the applicant-revisionist no. 1 came to live at her matrimonial house in District Muzaffar Nagar and performed her marital obligation towards her husband and other family members to the satisfaction of all concerned and all family members and husband were pleased with the behaviour and working of the applicant no. 1. Tha
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.