R.M.BORDE, A.S.GADKARI
Mukesh Kothari – Appellant
Versus
State Bank of India – Respondent
R.M. Borde, J.—Heard.
2. Rule. With the consent of the parties, Petition is taken up for final disposal at the admission stage.
3. The Petitioner is objecting to the decision rendered by the Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal at Mumbai in Appeal No. 117 of 2009 decided on 16th June 2014 confirming the decision rendered by the Debts Recovery Tribunal – III at Mumbai in S. A. No. 35 of 2007 decided on 16th April 2009. The Petitioner herein is purchaser of Flat No. 101, First Floor, Rajendra Kripa Cooperative Housing Society Ltd; Manish Darshan, Bidkanti Nagar, near Jain Temple, J. B. Nagar, Andheri (East), Mumbai – 59. The flat was purchased by Petitioner from Respondent No. 2 through a Saledeed dated 18th November 2006 for a sale consideration of Rs. 22.00 Lacs. According to Petitioner, the Sale Agreement was duly registered on 18th November 2006. The property has been purchased by Petitioner by obtaining housing loan from Respondent No. 3 – Allahabad Bank, in whose favour Petitioner is stated to have created Equitable mortgage in respect of the said flat. The Petitioner claims that Respondent No. 1 – State Bank of India has taken steps under Section 13(4) of the SARFAESI Ac
Ghanshyam Sarda vs. Shashikant Jha, Director, M/s. J.K. Jute Mills Company Limited and Ors.
K. J. Nathan vs. S.V. Maruthi Rao
Keshrimal Jivji Shah and Anr. vs. Bank of Maharashtra and Ors.
Surjit Singh and Ors. vs. Harbans Singh and Ors.
Thomson Press (India) Limited vs. Nanak Builders and Investors Private Limited and Ors.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.