JUDGMENT AND ORDER (ORAL)

A.K. Goswami, J.—Heard Mr. B. N. Sarma, learned counsel for the appellants/defendants. Also heard Mr. K. Sarma, learned counsel for the respondents/plaintiffs.

2. This appeal is preferred by the defendants against the judgment and decree dated 24.03.2006, passed by the learned Civil Judge (Senior Division), Barpeta, in Title Appeal No. 56/2005, allowing the appeal and reversing the judgment and decree dated 23.09.1995, passed by the learned Civil Judge, Junior Division, Barpeta, in Title Suit No. 107/99, whereby the suit of the plaintiffs was dismissed.

3. Plaintiff No. 1 is the wife of plaintiff No. 2. The case projected in the plaint, shorn of details, is that in Schedule-’A’ land, there is total 2 Bigha 2 Katha 13 Lecha of land covered by Dag No. 203 under K.P. Patta No. 128 at village Uttar Athiabari. In Dag No. 205 of K.P. Patta No. 129, and Dag No. 204 of K.P. Patta No. 129 of the same village, there is 2 Katha 9 Lecha 13 Lecha of land, respectively, and, thus, in Periodic Patta No. 129, there is 3 Katha 2 Lecha of land. Details in respect of land in K.P. Patta No. 129 are given in Schedule-’B’.

4. Plaintiff No. 1 purchased 1 Katha 15 Lecha of land in

Click Here to Read the rest of this document