SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

P.S.RANA
Banshi Ram – Appellant
Versus
Ram Chand – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Revisionist:Mr.T.S.Chauhan, Advocate
For the Non-Revisionist:Mr.Vikas Rathore, Advocate

JUDGMENT

P.S.Rana, J.—Present criminal revision petition is filed under Sections 397 and 401 Cr.P.C. against judgment dated 23.12.2013 passed by learned trial Court in RBT No.39/3 of 2011/10 title Ram Chand vs. Banshi Ram and affirmed by learned Appellate Court vide judgment dated 26.02.2015 in criminal appeal No.8/10 of 2014 title Bansi Ram vs. Ram Chand.

Brief Facts of the Case

2. Brief facts of case are that Ram Chand complainant filed complaint under Section 138 of Negotiable Instrument Act 1881 pleaded therein that complainant is proprietor of M/s. Ankit Hire Purchase Private Limited Bharari Tehsil Ghurnarwin District Bilaspur H.P. It is pleaded that complainant is running the business of financing the vehicles providing loan. It is pleaded that in the month of June 2009 accused approached the complainant for debt and complainant gave a sum of Rs.150000/- (Rupees one lac fifty thousand only) as loan to accused. It is pleaded that accused assured to return the amount on or before March 2010. It is pleaded that accused did not return the loan amount and thereafter complainant approached the accused personally and accused issued cheque bearing NO.5025481 payable in H.P. State Cooper































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top