SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

H.G.RAMESH, RATHNAKALA
Shilpa – Appellant
Versus
Praveen S. R. – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Appellant:Ms. V. Vidy Iyer, Advocate
For the Respondent:Sri. S.S. Yadrami, Advocate

JUDGMENT

H.G. Ramesh, J.—The appellant/wife is aggrieved by the decree of divorce granted by the Principal Judge, Family Court, Bellary (for short ‘the Family Court’) on his file in Matrimonial Case No.221/2013 dated 30.10.2014 thereby dissolving her marriage with the respondent/husband.

2. Succinctly stated, the husband filed a petition for divorce before the Family Court under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (for short ‘the Act’), alleging that the parties were married as per their customs on 1.12.2011 at Bellary. At the relevant point of time, he was working as Software Engineer at Bangalore and wife had M.C.A. graduation. Marriage was consummated and wife joined him at his parents’ house at Bellary. They went out on a honeymoon from 12.12.2011 to 16.12.2011 and stayed at Munnar and Alleppi. On 15.12.2011, husband told the wife to stay at her parents’ place for a period of three months, so that he can look out for a house for their stay at Bangalore. Immediately the wife became wild, locked the door from inside and did not open it for more than two hours. When he tried to open the door forcibly, she threatened him to commit suicide. Immediately he contacted her father a















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top