ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT
Vilas V. Afzulpurkar, J.
Andhra Association of Telangana -Petitioner
versus
Union of India, Rep. by its Central Board of Film Certification, Hyderabad & Ors.
-Respondents
Writ Petition No.15355 of 2015
Decided on 4.6.2015
Result: Petition dismissed.
Vilas V. Afzulpurkar, J.—At the stage of admission, I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner appearing in the place of party-in-person, learned Assistant Solicitor General appearing for first respondent, learned Government Pleader for Women Development and Child Welfare appearing for fourth respondent and Mr. M. Surender Rao, learned senior counsel, appearing for the fifth respondent. Respondents 2 and 3, the Department of Cinematography and the Telangana Film Chamber of Commerce, are not involved in the certification of the film in controversy and respondents 6 and 7, being actress and distributor, are not necessary to be heard.
2. Petitioner questions the title of the film Andhra Pori, which is proposed to be exhibited on 5.6.2015. Petitioner states that after bifurcation of the State there are many people from Andhra area settled and residing in Telangana State and depiction of the name of the film as aforesaid is likely to be misutilized by way of degrading the values of girls in Andhra area and residents originating from Andhra area settled in Telangana area.
3. For the purpose of appreciating the exact objection of the petitioner, it is appropriate to extract para 8 of the affidavit, as under, which, inter alia, states that the word Pori suffixed to the title of the film is objectionable. Petitioner, therefore, seeks that the exhibition of the film with the aforesaid title be interfered with by this Court as it amounts to showing disrespect to the girls of young/marriageable age of Andhra region.
“8. I submit that the very selection of the name Andhra Pori is combination of Two States slang, the earlier prefix Andhra is from Andhra slang is the name of the region of Andhra state and the suffix Pori is Telangana used Slang which literally means the Girl of a young age/marriageable age. This synomos of Pori are Ammayi, Pilla, Yuvathi, Bidda form the respectable pronunciation of calling a girl of youth age on the other hand the words Guntadi, Kurradi, Pori are form the objectionable pronunciation to de-grade the self respect of the girl of young age promoting/raising the modesty of the girl of youth age which is within the meaning of definition under Section 2 sub-section (a) of Indecent representation of Women (Prohibition) Act, 1986 which reads as follows:
“Advertisement includes any notice, circular, liable, wrapper, or other documents and also includes any visible Representation made by means of any light, sound, smoke or gas.”
4. Learned counsel for the first respondent has contended that the Central Board of Film Certification has appointed an examining committee, which has certified the film for unrestricted universal public exhibition. The file of the first respondent is placed before this Court, which shows that the Board required an examining committee to examine the film and then suggest its opinion and the report of the committee states that it had held detailed discussion on the film, treatment and presentation of the film in the light of the guidelines issued by the Government under Section 5B (2) of the Cinematograph Act, 1952 (for short the Act) and suggested deletion of certain words from the portion of the film and also suggested a visual to be shown in a flash by referring to guidelines 2(viii), 2 (xii) and 2 (vii) respectively and recommended to grant U certificate with cuts unanimously. Accordingly, certificate was issued by CBFC on 28.5.2015, after being satisfied with the modifications suggested by the Board have actually been carried out.
5. Mr. M. Surender Rao, learned senior counsel appearing for respondent No.5, has placed strong reliance upon Section 3 of the Act, which provides that the Board shall consist of a Chairman and not less than 12 and not more than twenty-five other members appointed by the Central Government and such large body is entrusted with the certification of the film. Learned senior counsel also points out that the Board appoints an examining committee for the pur
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.