M.S. Ramachandra Rao, J.—This appeal is preferred against the judgment and decree dt.24.7.1995 in OS.No.35 of 1991 of the I-Addl. Sub-Ordinate Judge, Visakhapatnam.

2. The appellants are plaintiffs in the suit. The suit was filed for recovery of possession of the plaint. ‘A’ Schedule properties after evicting the 1st defendant therefrom, for future profits and costs. Subsequewntly, the plaint was amended vide Order dated 7.2.1995 and the relief of declaration of the title of the plaintiffs was also added to the above reliefs.

3. The plaintiffs are brothers and are sons of late G. Kurmanadha Patro of Parvathipuram. Late G. Kurmanadha Patro was the only son of his father late Sitaram Patro through his legally wedded wife Seetamma @ Subadramma. Sitararna Patro died on 2.5.1954 and was residing during his lifetime at Visakhapatnam where he was working as Huzur Sheristadar in the Office of the District Collector.

4. Sitaram Patro also lived with a lady by name Nulu Narasamma, who was allegedly his mistress, during his lifetime. They had a daughter by name Kanaka Mahalakshmi and a son by name Ganapathi Rao. Narasamma also had another daughter by name Subhadramma @ Bojjamma (herei