R.P.SONDURBALDOTA
Prabhakar Xembu Bhandari – Appellant
Versus
State of Goa – Respondent
R.P. Sondur Baldota, J.— Ru1e. Made returnable forthwith. By consent of parties the petition is taken on board for final hearing.
2. The petitioners are the plaintiffs in Civil Suit No. 78/2011 wherein they had filed an application for amendment of the plaint. That application was rejected by the trial court vide its order dated 7th January, 2013. The present petition is directed against that order.
3. In their suit the petitioners have sought five permanent reliefs out of which three are for declarations and others for permanent injunctions. The first declaration sought is that the petitioners have an easementary right of access over survey No.26/2 which is being objected to by respondents No.10 & 11, its present owners. The second declaration sought is that the land at survey No.26/2 consists of hilly area with a steep slope and not within the permissible gradient for development and that “Divzam Fator” “Sati Shila” stones cannot be permitted to be destroyed, since they are of sentimental value and historical importance. The third declaration sought is that approval if any obtained by respondents No.10 & 11 from various authorities for sub-division of survey No.26/2 is i
Jai Jai Ram Manohar Lal v. National Building Material Supply, Gurgaon
M/s. Ganesh Trading Co. v. Moji Ram
Rajesh Kumar Aggarwal and Ors. v. K.K. Modi & Ors.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.