Nandakumar Singh, J.—Heard Mr. D. Mazumdar, learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner. This revision petition is directed against the judgment and order of the learned Assistant Judge, Shillong dated 2.5.2013 passed in TS No.3 (H) 2011 allowing the defendant Nos. 3 and 4 to file the written statement subject to the payment of cost of Rs.2,000.

2. For this judgment proposing to pass by this Court. it may not be required to issue notice to the respondents. i.e. defendant No.3 and 4 inasmuch as the impugned order dated 2.5.2013 is not going to be quashed in whole.

3. Mr. D. Mazumdar, learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner/plaintiff strenuously contended that only for the purpose of delaying the speedy disposal of T.S. Nos. 3 (H) 2001. applications had been filed one after another by the different persons for impleadment as defendants. It is further stated that one application was filed by Smt. E. Eblura Khongthohrem for impleadment as a defendant in the TS No. 3 (H) 2001 claiming to be the second wife of the petitioner/plaintiff. The order of the learned Trial Court below allowing to implead Smt. E. Eblura Khongthohrem as defendant in TS No.3 (H) 2001 had been set asi