CILAS V.AFZULPURKAR
Boya Pareshappa – Appellant
Versus
G. Raghavendra – Respondent
Cilas V. Afzulpurkar, J.— The appellants herein are defendant Nos.2 and 3 in O.S.No.104 of 2003 on the file of Principal Junior Civil Judge, Adoni, Kurnool District, The said suit was filed by respondent Nos.1 to 9 herein against respondent No.10 and the appellants for perpetual injunction initially and later converted to a suit for declaration of title and for perpetual injunction. The said suit was dismissed by the trial court, but reversed in appeal by the appellate court. Hence, this appeal by the appellants, who are purchasers from respondent No.101 defendant No.1 in the suit.
2. For the sake of convenience, the parties herein will be referred to as they are arrayed in the suit.
3. Facts in brief are as follows:
(a) Plaintiffs claim to be absolute owners and possessors of suit schedule property having acquired the same by virtue of a registered Will, dated 19.11.1997, Ex.A2 executed by paternal grandmother of the plaintiffs. It is alleged that the schedule property originally belonged to paternal grandfather of the plaintiffs namely Gurukul Narsingappa, who had earlier purchased the property under registered sale deed, dated 20.1.1953, Ex. Al. It is stated that after
T.K. Mohammed Abubucker v. P.S. M. Ahamed Abdul Khader
Lakhan Sao v. Dharamu Chaudhary
Askari Begum v. Mohd. Ayaz Khan
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.