SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

A.P.BHANGALE
Ganpat Janu Wagh – Appellant
Versus
Vanmala – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Appellant:Mr.A.V. Bhide, Advocate
For the Respondent: None

JUDGMENT

A.P.Bhangale, J.—This appeal challenges the judgment and order dated 8th September 1998 delivered by the Additional District Judge, Khamgaon in Regular Civil Appeal No.47 of 1990 confirming the judgment and order dated 30th July 1990 passed by the Civil Judge, JD, Jalgaon (Jamod), District Buldana in Regular Civil Suit No.50 of 1981 whereby suit of the plaintiffs (present respondents No.1 and 2) was decreed. In that, original defendants No.1 and 2 were directed to deliver possession of suit property i.e. Gat No.5/6, area 1.21 HR situated at village Khamkhed, residential house situated in Ward No.10, Jalgaon (Jamod) described in plaint paragraph 3 to the plaintiff. It was the grievance of the plaintiffs Vanmala and Sunanda that 1st defendant i.e. Ganpat Janu without any right, title or interest, sold gat No.5/6 situated at Khamkhed, Tahsil Jalgaon Jamod, District Buldana to Vasant Sakharam (original defendant No.2) vide sale deed dated 23.2.1981 for a sum of Rs.6,500. Contention of the plaintiffs was that they had immediately by notice dated 27.2.1981 (exhibit 31) had called upon defendants to restore possession of the suit land to the plaintiffs, but their notice remained












Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top