SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

MANMOHAN SINGH
Seema – Appellant
Versus
Alkesh Chaudhary – Respondent


Counsel for the Parties:
For the Appellant:Mr. R.K. Kapoor with Ms. Shweta Kapoor, Advocates
For the Respondent: None

JUDGMENT

Manmohan Singh, J.—By this order I propose to decide the pending applications, being CM No.2284/2006 and CM No.13056/2012, filed by the appellant/applicant.

2. Brief facts for the purpose of adjudication of the matter are that Dr.Seema and Dr.Alkesh Chaudhary were married on 17th April, 1992. A male child was born to them on 22nd May, 1996. The child is with the mother. A petition for dissolution of marriage was filed by the respondent on 9th January, 1997. It was allowed on 5th February, 2004. Dr.Seema filed an appeal before this Court which was dismissed on 31st January, 2011. During the pendency of the appeal, Dr.Seema filed an application, being CM No.2284/2006 which was directed to be decided at the time of final hearing of the appeal but while passing the judgment in the appeal, the said application remained undecided.

3. After the dismissal of the appeal, Dr.Seema filed a Special Leave Petition before the Supreme Court which was also dismissed. After the dismissal of the Special Leave Petition, Dr.Seema moved an application, being CM No.12396/2011, for restoration of the pending application, being CM No.2284/2006. The said application was allowed by order dated 17th Ja




























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top