Back
L.NARASIMHA REDDY, M.S.K.JAISWAL
Ch. Venkata Rao – Appellant
Versus
J. R. Rameshji – Respondent
L. Narasimha Reddy, J.—The 1st appellant filed the Suit in O.S. No. 62 of 1980 in the Court of the Additional Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad, against the 2nd respondent for recovery of Rs. 38,000/-. The Suit was decreed on 30.11.1981. By obtaining of precept, the 1st appellant filed E.P. No.5 of 1987 in the Court of Subordinate Judge, Siddipet for recovery of a sum of Rs. 53,067-50 ps. The E.P. Schedule property situated at Mulugu was attached on 26.4.1988. The 1st respondent filed a claim petition, being E.A. No.20 of 1988 under Rule 58 of Order 21 of C.P.C. in E.P. No.5 of 1987. He pleaded that the E.P. schedule property was purchased by him on 15.9.1986 under Ex.A1 and that the attachment of the said property is untenable. The E.A. was opposed by the appellants. The Executing Court dismissed the E.A. through order dated 25.8.1992. Aggrieved by that, the 1st respondent filed A.S.No.1959 of 1992 before this Court. A learned Single Judge of this Court allowed the said appeal through judgment dated 24.9.2001. Then, this Letters Patent Appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent.
2. Sri G. Krsihna Murthy, learned counsel for the appellants submits that one M/s. J.B. Bodo
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
