Back
DINESH GUPTA
Kedar – Appellant
Versus
Umrai – Respondent
Dinesh Gupta, J.—This second appeal is preferred against the judgment dated 15th September, 1980 passed by IInd Civil Judge, Varanasi in Civil Appeal No.404 of 1979 arising out of judgment dated 31st August, 1979 passed by Munsif, Hawali, Varanasi in Original Suit No.565 of 1975.
2. The brief facts, which give rise to this appeal are that the plaintiffs-appellants (hereinafter called as the “appellants”) filed Original Suit No.565 of 1975 against the defendants-respondents (hereinafter called as the “respondents”) for the relief of cancellation of gift deed dated 16.7.1975.
3. The allegations made in the plaint were that the plaintiff no.1 was son of Bharosh and plaintiff no.2 was the son of Khemai. The respondent no.1 Smt. Umrai was widow of Mangroo and the respondent no.2 was the daughter of respondent no.1 Smt. Umrai. The plaintiff no.1 and the father of the plaintiff no.2 were sons of one Bharosh, who expired about 32-35 years before filing of the suit and after the death of Mangroo, a family settlement arrived at between the plaintiffs and the respondent no.1 Smt. Umrai to this effect that the plaintiff will remain the owner of ancestral properties left by Mangroo and t
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
