SATISH K.AGNIHOTRI, M.M.SUNDRESH
V. L. Dhandapani – Appellant
Versus
Revathy Ramachandran – Respondent
Satish K. Agnihotri and M.M. Sundresh, J.—Civil Revision Petition in C.R.P(PD) No.1337 of 2009 has been filed against the order dated 19..12.2008 passed in I.A.No.1241 of 2008 in O.S.No.254 of 2002 on the file of District Munsif Court, Chengalpattu.
2. The learned Single Judge, in and by the order dated 12.1.2011, was pleased to refer the following issue to be decided by the Larger Bench as in his view, there are conflicting decisions over the same.
“Whether the transferee pendente lite is entitled to be impleaded in the suit”
3. In view of the said issue having been referred to the Division Bench, as a consequence, C.R.P.(PD) Nos.2062 of 2011, 1056 of 2011 and 1249 of 2011 were also directed to be posted alongwith C.R.P.(PD) No.1337 of 2009. Accordingly, all the four revisions are before us.
4. The learned counsels appearing for the petitioners have made submissions on merits. In all these revisions, challenge is to the orders passed in the interlocutory applications filed pending suits. The suits are pending for quite some time. Therefore, we do not propose to send back the revisions before the learned single Judge and instead we decide them on merits.
5. Brief Facts:
Vinod Seth v. Devinder Bajaj (2010) 8 SCC 1. (Para 15)
A. Nawab John & Ors. v. V.N. Subramanyam (2012) 7 SCC 738. (Para 15)
Jayaram Mudaliar v. Ayyaswami and Ors.
Amit Kumar Shaw v. Farida Khatoon (2005) 11 SCC 403. (Para 15)
Rikhu Dev, Chela Bawa Harjug Dass v. Som Dass (deceased) through his Chela Shiama Dass
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.