T.V.NALAWADE
Ramrao Nilkanthrao Patil (Died through L. Rs. ) Shobhbai Ramrao Patil – Appellant
Versus
Dhondaji @ Ramesh (Died through L. Rs. ) Shakuntala Dhondaji @ Ramesh Patil – Respondent
T.V. Nalawade, J.—The appeal is filed against judgment and decree of Regular Civil Appeal No. 239/1982 which was pending in the Court of 3rd Additional District Judge, Nanded. The judgment and decree of Regular Civil Suit No. 150/1979 filed by the present appellant for relief of partition and possession was partly decreed by the Trial Court, the Court from Degloor, and this decision is confirmed by the District Court in First Appeal. Both the sides are heard.
2. The suit was filed in respect of agricultural lands situated at village Aloor, Tahsil Degloor, District Nanded. The plaintiff/appellant had claimed 7/18th share in all the agricultural lands. The relief is given to the plaintiff in respect of few suit properties, but the Courts below have held that lands Gat Nos. 630, 643 and 96 belonge to defendant No. 5 and she is the absolute owner of these three lands. The Courts below have given 1/3rd share to the plaintiff in remaining lands. The decision only in respect of aforesaid three lands is challenged by the plaintiff.
3. The suit was filed by appellant through his maternal uncle and the maternal uncle represented as next friend. Defendant No. 6 - Saraswatibai is the mot
Apoorva Shantilal Shah Vs. Commissioner of Income-Tax, Gujrat I, Ahmedabad
Sharad Subramanyan Vs. Soumi Mazumdar and Ors.
Gulabrao Balwantrao Shinde & ors. Vs. Chhabubai Balwantrao Shinde & ors.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.