SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

KRISHNA MURARI, PRATYUSH KUMAR
Sayed Shahabuddin – Appellant
Versus
Rajeev – Respondent


Counsel for the Parties:
For the Appellant:A.P. Tewari, S.S. Tripathi, Advocates

JUDGMENT

1. The instant appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 17.3.2015 passed by Civil Judge (S.D.), Gorakhpur in O.S. No.963 of 2014, Sayed Shahabuddin Vs. Rajeev and others, whereby application for temporary injunction filed by the plaintiff/appellant (hereinafter referred as “appellant”) was rejected.

2. Heard learned counsel for the appellant.

3. Learned counsel for the appellant in support of the appeal has contended that the appellant is Bhoomidhar in possession of plot nos.83 & 85, construction of his dwelling house is going on, defendants/respondents (hereinafter referred as “respondents”) with a view to grabbing the property are creating obstruction and claiming that they would make nurses’ hostel and doctors’ residences over the land of the appellant. In Civil Misc. Writ Petition No.17147 of 2009 this court has passed interim order, which is still operative, but the respondents are disobeying the order. When the appellant filed a suit before the court below on the strength of order dated 31.3.2009, application for temporary injunction was illegally rejected.

4. Learned counsel for the appellant submits further that in favour of the appellant prima facie cas






























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top