SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

KERALA HIGH COURT
K.T. Sankaran and M.L. Joseph Francis, JJ.
Gijoosh Gopi —Petitioner
versus
Sruthi —Respondent
O.P. (F.C.) No. 2272 of 2012
Decided on: 17.08.2012

Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Rinny Stephen Chamaparambil and Ms. Asha Elizabeth Mathew, Advocates.
For the Respondent:Mr. P.Supramodam and Mr. Jawahar Jose, Advocates.

IMPORTANT POINT
In exceptional circumstances, Court can entertain petition under Section 13B of Hindu Marriage Act, even before expiry of one year, invoking proviso to Section 14 of the Act.

Headnote:Hindu Marriage Act, 1955—Sections 13B, 14 Proviso—Petition for Divorce by mutual consent filed by parties—Since the applications was filed before expiry of period of one year from date of marriage, parties filed an application under proviso to Section 14 of the Act to allow them to present petition under section 13B before expiry of one years since date of marriage—Dismissed by Court below—Challenge thereagainst—The proviso to section 14(1) is an exception to the necessity for expiration of a period of one year since the date of marriage to enable a party to file a petition for divorce—If an application for leave under the proviso to Section 14 is presented by parties, what the Court is expected to look into is whether there is exceptional hardship to petitioner or exceptional depravity on part of respondent—Instantly marriage did not really last even for a day—Marriage was even not consummated—It was a case of one of exceptional hardship to parties —It would be impossible for parties to continue relationship any further—In the facts and circumstances of case, Court below ought to have allowed application for leave under proviso to Section 14 of the Act—Impugned Order Passed by Court below set aside—Application filed by petitioners to grant leave allowed. (Paras 6 to 8)

       Result: Ordered Accordingly

       

JUDGMENT

K.T. Sankaran, J.—The marriage between the petitioner and the respondent was solemnized on 24.04.2012. The parties are Hindus. On the date of marriage itself, they realized that they could not continue the marital relationship. The respondent expressed the view that she was not willing for the marriage and she wanted to marry another man. She also stated that she agreed for the marriage only due to the compulsion on the part of her parents. The marriage was not consummated. Mediators intervened. On 31.05.2012, an agreement was executed between the parties in the presence of the representatives of SNDP Sakhas in which the parties are members. On the same day, viz., 31.05.2012, the parties filed a petition under Section 13B of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (for short, ‘the Act’) before the Family Court, Alappuzha. Since the application was filed before the expiry of the period of one year from the date of marriage, they filed an application under the proviso to Section 14 of the Act to allow them to present the petition under Section 13B before the expiry of one year since the date of marriage. In the affidavit, the facts and circumstances were explained in detail. It was also stated that exceptional hardship would be caused to the parties, if the petition was not entertained.

2. The court below dismissed the application for leave to present the petition before the expiry of one year of the date of marriage, by the order impugned in this Original Petition (FC). The Family Court held that no exceptional circumstances were made out for granting leave as prayed for by the parties.

3. Section 13B of the Act was inserted by the Marriage Laws (Amendment) Act, 1976 (Act 68 of 1976). Sub-S.(1) of S.13B reads as follows:

13B. Divorce by mutual consent —

(1) Subject to the provisions of this Act a petition for dissolution of marriage by a decree of divorce may be presented to the district court by both the parties to a marriage together, whether such marriage was solemnized before or after the commencement of the Marriage Laws (Amendment) Act, 1976 (68 of 1976), on the ground that they have been living separately for a period of one year or more, that they have not been able to live together and that they have mutually agreed that the marriage should be dissolved.

(2) On the motion of both the parties made not earlier than six months after the date of the presentation of the petition referred to in sub-section (1) and not later than eighteen months after the said date, if the petition is not withdrawn in the meantime, the Court shall, on being satisfied, after hearing the parties and after making such inquiry as it thinks fit, that a marriage has been solemnized and that the averments in the petition are true, pass a decree of divorce declaring the marriage to be dissolved with effect from the date of the decree.

4. It is provided in sub-S.(1) of S.13B that a petition for dissolution of marriage by a decree of divorce under S.13B may be filed “subject to the provisions of the Act”. Section 14 of the Act provides that notwithstanding anything contained in the Act, it shall not be competent for any court to entertain any petition for dissolution of a marriage by a decree of divorce, unless at the date of presentation of the petition one year has elapsed since the date of the marriage. The words “unless at the date of presentation of the petition one year has elapsed” were substituted by the Amendment Act 68 of 1976 for the words “before three years have elapsed”.

5. For the sake of convenience, S.14 of the Act is extracted below:

“14. No petition for divorce to be presented within one year of marriage-

(1) Notwithstanding anything contained in this Act, it shall not be competent for any Court to entertain any petition for dissolution of a marriage by a decree of divorce, unless at the date of the presentation of the petition one year has elapsed since the date of the marriage:

Provided that the Court may, upon application m







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top