SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

SHABIHUL HASNAIN
Rekha Devi – Appellant
Versus
Abhishek Misra – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioner:Vinay Misra, Advocate.
For the Respondent:Kaushal Kishor Verma, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

Shabihul Hasnain, J.— This is an appeal from order under Section 28 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1957 read with Section 19 of the Family Court Act against the judgment and decree dated 25.7.2011 passed by the Additional District Judge, Room No.1, District Sultanpur in Regular Case No. 687 of 2010, Smt. Rekha Devi v. Abhishekh Misra, wherein the appeal has been dismissed.

2. The appellant has prayed for setting aside the judgment and decree on a number of grounds but the main ground taken by the appellant is that the suit has been dismissed despite ‘No objection’ from the husband opposite party. The learned court below was of the opinion that suit for divorce could not have been allowed under the provision in which it was filed. The learned court below was of the view that on the grounds mentioned in the suit a decree on the basis of mutual consent could not have been issued. It was observed that for this purpose a regular suit under Section 13B of the Hindu Marriage Act should have been instituted. Mutual consent can not be a ground for getting a divorce under the provisions in which the suit was filed.

3. This court feels that the order of learned court below can not be faul



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top