MUNGESHWAR SAHOO
Kalawati Devi – Appellant
Versus
Yoganti Devi – Respondent
Mungeshwar Sahoo, J.— I have already heard the learned counsel Mr.Chandrakant on behalf of the petitioners and the learned counsel Mr. Ranjan Kumar Dubey on behalf of the respondents in both the applications.
2. C.W.J.C.No.12994 of 2011 has been filed by the plaintiffs petitioners against the order dated 5.8.2010 passed by Sub-Judge 5th, Siwan in Title Suit No.165 of 2008, whereby the court below rejected the petition filed by the plaintiffs for adding subsequent purchaser as defendant No.4 in the suit for specific performance of contract.
3. The other C.W.J.C. No.13934 of 2011 has been filed against the order dated 29.4.2011 passed by the said court rejecting the review application filed by the petitioners for reviewing the order challenged in C.W.J.C.No.12994 of 2011. In view of the above facts both the writ applications are heard together in admission matter and disposed of by this common order. The result of the writ application arising out of the original order rejecting the application under Order 1, Rule 10 CPC will govern the result of the subsequent writ application.
4. The plaintiffs petitioners filed Title Suit No. 165 of 2005 for specific performance of contract a
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.