SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

NARESH H.PATIL, A.R.JOSHI
Shobha Sanjay Jadhav – Appellant
Versus
Sanjay Ramchandra Jadhav – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Appellant:Mr. V.S. Kapse, Advocate.
For the Respondent:Mr. Machindra Patil, Advocate.

JUDGMENT (ORAL)

A.R. Joshi, J.—Present appeal is preferred by the wife/original petitioner challenging the judgment and order passed in Family Court Petition No.C140/2001 by Family Court No.3, Bandra, Mumbai. The impugned judgment and order was passed on 17.7.2004 by which the prayer of wife for maintenance was rejected, however, the maintenance of Rs.l,000 per month was granted to the minor child, to be paid by the husband present respondent from the date of the order i.e. from 17.7.2004. The respondent/husband was also directed to pay Rs.1,000 towards the litigation expenses to the petitioner wife. The appellant wife is hereinafter referred to as the wife and the respondent husband is referred to as the husband for the sake of brevity.

2. The wife preferred petition for maintenance to herself as per the provisions of Section 18 and maintenance for her own daughter then aged about three years, as per the provisions of Section 20 of the Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act, 1956. An amount of Rs.1,500 was claimed by the wife for herself and an amount of Rs.l,000 for minor girl child, by name Priyanka. In the petition, it was also prayed that custody of the minor child shall be given





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top