SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

VEENA BIRBAL
Ravi Luthra – Appellant
Versus
Rekha – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Appellant:Mr I.P. Singh, Advocate.
For the Respondent:Mr. S.K. Duggal, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

Veena Birbal, J.—Present is an appeal under Section 28 of the Hindu Marriage Act (hereinafter referred to as ‘the HMA’) filed by the appellant/husband against the impugned judgment/decree dated 9th September, 2002 by which the petition of the respondent/wife under Section 12(1)(a) of the HMA has been decreed and the marriage between the parties has been annulled by a decree of nullity on the ground of impotency of the appellant/husband.

2. Briefly the facts relevant for the disposal of the appeal are as under:

The marriage between the parties was solemnized on 11th February, 1997 at Delhi according to Hindu rites and ceremonies. At the time of marriage, respondent/wife was 23 years of age and appellant/husband was 34 years of age. Respondent/wife had alleged that her marriage was not consummated due to impotency of the appellant/husband. It was alleged that on the first night of marriage, respondent/wife fully cooperate with appellant but because of feeble erection in the male organ he could not consummate the marriage. Thereupon, appellant/husband started saying that he was feeling tired and then parties went to sleep. In the morning, the respondent/wife enquired from hi
































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top