Pramila Das VS Jugmaprava Mohanty

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

B.K.PATEL
Pramila Das – Appellant
Versus
Jugmaprava Mohanty – Respondent

Counsel for the Parties:
For the Appellant:Samir Kumar Mishra, J. Pradhan, P. Prusty and D.K. Pradhan, Advocates.
For the Respondents:Shyamanada Mohapatra, Prasanna Panda and Tapas Kumar Praharaj, Advocates.

JUDGMENT

B.K. Patel, J.—The second appeal is directed against the judgment and decree dated 31.1.2012 passed by learned District Judge, Cuttack dismissing R.F.A. No. 179 of 2011 and confirming the order dated 5.9.2011 passed by learned Civil Judge (Senior Division), 1st Court, Cuttack in T.S. No. 531 of 1996-1 rejecting, and refusing to admit, counter-claim of the appellant as being barred by limitation.

2. Appellant is defendant No.2 and respondent No. 1 is the plaintiff in T.S. No. 531 of 1996-1. Originally respondent No. 5 as plaintiff/instituted the suit for eviction of the appellant from the suit property. On 6.8.1997 the appellant filed written statement disputing the claim of the original plaintiff. Issues were settled on 2.2.2000. On 30.12.2002 registered sale-deed in respect of the suit property was executed by original plaintiff in favour of the respondent No. 1. On 9.3.2004 in view of application filed by the respondent No.1, respondent No. 1 was added as a plaintiff. Thereafter, on 8.9.2004 the appellant filed counter-claim. By order dated 19.4.2005, in response to application filed by respondent No.1, original plaintiff was .transposed as proforma defendant No. 9. On 2