Back
P.R.SHIVAKUMAR
G. Subramani – Appellant
Versus
I. V. Rajasekaran – Respondent
P.R. Shivakumar, J.—The arguments advanced by Mr. K.S. Sankhar Murali, learned counsel for the petitioner and by Mr. A. Edwin Prabakar, learned counsel for the first respondent are heard.
2. The first defendant in the original suit in O.S. No. 81 of 2011 is the petitioner in the Civil Revision Petition. The suit was filed by the first respondent herein for the following relief’s
“(a) Dissolution of partnership;
(b) Rendition of accounts; and
(c) Equal distribution of the assets of the partnership.”
All those prayers have been made based on another prayer that a deed of retirement from partnership dated 19.5.2010 was null and void and that the said document should be declared null and void of course, while framing the suit, the prayer for the other relief’s had been placed above the prayer for the relief of declaration of the deed of retirement to be null and void. Such a defect shall be only in the form and it cannot be stated to be a material defect to assume that the earlier prayers were not based on the subsequent prayer.
3. The first defendant, viz., the petitioner in the Civil Revision.
Petition, after entering appearance and filing a written statement in the suit in O.S.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
