Bela M. Trivedi, J.— The appellant-plaintiff has preferred the appeal under Section 96 read with Order XLI Rule 1 of CPC challenging the judgment & decree dated 26.7.1982 passed by the Additional District Judge, Jaipur City, Court No.7 (hereinafter referred to as “the trial court”) in Civil Suit No.86/76 [64/80], so far as the findings recorded by the trial court relating to the issue Nos. 1, 2 & 4 are concerned. The respondents-defendants have filed their cross-objections under Order XLI Rule 22 of CPC in the appeal challenging the said decree, so far as the findings relating to the issue Nos.3, 5 & 7 are concerned.

2. The appellant plaintiff had filed the suit against the respondents-defendants seeking partition and her l/8th share in the immovable properties belonging to the HUF including the house bearing No.1182 situated at Natanion Ki Gali, Chora Rasta, Jaipur, and sought permanent injunction in respect of the movable properties described in the Schedules K & Kh annexed to the plaint. It was alleged in the plaint inter alia that Late Shri Niranjan Singh, husband of the appellant plaintiff, was the eldest son of the defendant No.1 Sardar Nanak Singh. The said Niranjan