Maya Dolo VS Vijoy Tachang

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

P.K.MUSAHARY
Maya Dolo – Appellant
Versus
Vijoy Tachang – Respondent

Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioners:N. Saikia, N.J. Dutta and Mrs. W. Sultana, Advocates.
For the Respondents:Smt. M. Bora, GA, A. Kashyap and S.K. Deori, Advocates.

JUDGMENT

P.K. Musahary J.—Heard Mr. N.N. Saikia, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Mr. N.J. Dutta, learned Counsel for the review petitioner. Mrs. M. Bora, learned Govt. Advocate for respondent Nos. 5 to 12 and Mr. A. Kashyap, learned Counsel appearing for respondent Nos.1 to 4.

2. This application has been filed seeking review of the judgment and order dated 7.4.2010 passed by this Court in WP (C) No.20 (AP) 2009 by which the aforesaid writ petition was allowed and the respondent Deputy Commissioner. East Kameng District was directed to cancel the land possession certificates issued to the respondent No.7, the present review petitioner within 30 days from the date of receipt of the judgment and order presently sought to be reviewed. The writ petition was contested by the respondent No.7/Review petitioner by filing affidavit-in-opposition and the judgment and order was passed after hearing the parties concerned. The review has been sought for on the following ground:

(1) The review petitioner realized that certain vital issues were not pointed out by the learned Counsel during the course of hearing. There was an omission on the part of the review petitioner to point out that in te