SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

L.N.MITTAL
Bhim Singh – Appellant
Versus
Mewa Singh and Company – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Appellant:Mr. Ashok Bhardwaj, Advocate.

JUDGMENT (ORAL)

L.N. Mittal, J.–Plaintiff Bhim Singh, who succeeded in the trial court, but has been non-suited by the first-appellate court, has filed the instant second appeal.

2. Case of the plaintiff-appellant is that he and his brother used to jointly sell their crop at the shop of defendant No.1 —Commission Agent, of which defendants Nos. 2 and 3 are partners. Plaintiff and his brother sold their crops jointly till 1999 and thereafter, separately. Since Harri 1995 till Harri 2001 crops, they used to take fertilizers, oil and Insecticides etc. from defendants Nos. 1 to 3. On these allegations, the plaintiff filed suit for rendition of accounts since Kharif 1995 to Kharif 2001 crops sold by the plaintiff through defendants Nos.1 to 3. Plaintiff also claimed permanent injunction restraining the defendants from preparing forged and false documents on blank and printed papers, on which defendants have obtained signatures of plaintiff and account books, on which defendants have obtained signatures of plaintiff and restraining the defendants from effecting any recovery from the plaintiff on the basis thereof and from interfering in sale of crop by the plaintiff through some other Com











Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top