G.S. Sistani, J.—Present petition is directed against the order 13.12.2010 passed by learned Additional District Judge, Delhi, on an application filed by respondent (wife) under Section 24 of Hindu Marriage Act, by virtue of which, petitioner was directed to pay maintenance @ Rs.10,000 per month, to the respondent.

2. Counsel for the petitioner submits that learned trial court has exceeded its jurisdiction by awarding maintenance @ Rs.10,000, per month to the respondent. Counsel further submits that the respondent has misled the court with regard to income of the petitioner by stating that the petitioner is earning a sum of Rs.30,000 per month. It is next submitted by the counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is working as a Sales Supervisor with M/s. Kishan Lal Enterprises and is getting a monthly salary of Rs.6,200. Counsel also submits that learned trial court fell into error by ignoring the proof regarding income of the petitioner apart from the appointment letter and salary slip of the petitioner which was placed on record.

3. It is submitted by counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is a mere graduate and is still pursuing his MBA through distance le