SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

A.K.SHRIVASTAVA
Suresh Kumar Agrawal – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Neeraj Asar, Advocate.
For the Respondent: Mr. Sudesh Verma, GA.

JUDGMENT

A.K. Shrivastava, J.—By this writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, petitioners are seeking following reliefs:—

It is therefore prayed that the petition may kindly be allowed. The order impugned dated 02.11.2010, passed by the Board of Revenue Gwalior, (Annexure-P11), order dated 19.01.2010 passed by the Commissioner Rewa Division Rewa (Annexure, P9) and order dated 20.09.2007 passed by the Collector of Stamps Satna (Annexure-P7) may kindly be set aside. The case may kindly be remanded to the Collector of Stamps Satna.

2. The contention of learned counsel for petitioner is that an oral partition took between the members of Hindu Undivided Family on 31.03.1996 and accordingly erstwhile Hindu Undivided Family which was existing in the name of Ram Vishal Agrawal was partitioned by metes and bounds. The share in the immovable property, assets and liabilities were allotted to each Coparcener in the oral partition. To avoid any future misunderstanding and to maintain peace in the family on the basis of the oral partition which took place on 31.03.1996, a document of memorandum of partition based on earlier oral partition dated 21.03.1996 was prepared














Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top