SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

B.K.NAYAK
Ashwini Kumar Naik – Appellant
Versus
Gobardhan Naik – Respondent


Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioner:Srikar Kumar Rath, Advocate.
For the Opposite Party:Alekh Chandra Mohanty and G.N. Rout, Advocates

JUDGMENT

B.K. Nayak, J. —In this writ petition the petitioner, who is the plaintiff in Civil Suit No.85 of 2004 of the Court of learned Civil Judge (Senior Division), Sundargarh, has assailed the order dated 24.1.2011 passed by the said Court allowing amendment of the written statement of the opposite party-defendant by way of incorporation of counter claim.

2. The suit was filed by the petitioner seeking relief of declaration that the suit property was his absolute property. The defendant-opposite party is none other than the father of the petitioner. The plaintiff’s claim was that though defendant purchased the suit land by his own salary income, a house was constructed thereon by the joint efforts and finance of both the parties. The loan incurred by the defendant for the purpose of construction of the house could not be repaid by him, but it was ultimately repaid by the plaintiff for which the property was mortgaged with him by the defendant. Since for the development of the property and construction of the house, the plaintiff has borne the entire expenses it has become his absolute property. As it appears, the suit has been decreed on compromise in favour of the plaintiff-petit











Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top