SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

PANKAJ MITHAL
Laxmi Devi Tandon – Appellant
Versus
Kailash Nath Mehrotra – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Pankaj Mithal, J. —The plaintiff appellant has failed before both the courts below in a suit for permanent injunction concerning land measuring 718.3 square yards allegedly situate in the western portion of plot No.53 Mauja Delhi Sujanpur Gandhi Gram, Krishna Nagar, G T. Road, Kanpur Nagar.

2. It is admitted to the parties that plot No.53 belongs to the plaintiff and plot No.54 belongs to the defendants.

3. The only issue before the courts below was whether the land in dispute forms part of plot No.53 or not.

4. In the suit, a Vakil Commissioner was appointed for locating the land in dispute who submitted report dated 18.9.1971 paper No.52 Ga Exhibit No.1A. The trial court discarded the aforesaid report for various reasons and concluded that there is no evidence on record to establish that the disputed land forms part of plot No.53. Accordingly, the suit was dismissed. The plaintiff preferred an appeal. In appeal the then District Judge vide order dated 08.02.1978 framed the following issue and remitted it to the trial court for its finding:

Whether the land shown by letters ABGH in the site plan attached with the plaint is part of survey plot No.53 as alleged, if so, is the



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top