SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

L.N.MITTAL
Sukhminder Singh – Appellant
Versus
Mirbhai Singh – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Apellant:Mr. A.S. Jattana, Advocate.

JUDGMENT (ORAL)

L.N. Mittal, J. —Defendant Sukhminder Singh, having lost in both the courts below, has filed the instant second appeal.

2. Respondent/plaintiff Nirbhai Singh filed suit against defendant/appellant for recovery of Rs. 5,07,500 alleging that the defendant on 9.9.1999, borrowed Rs.3,50,000 from the plaintiff and agreed to repay the same with interest @ 1.5% per month and executed pronote and receipt for the same, but defendant did not repay the principal and interest amount. Accordingly, plaintiff sought recovery of Rs.3,50,000 as principal amount and Rs.1,57,500 as interest till filing of the suit i.e. total amount of Rs.5,07,500.

3. Defendant broadly denied the plaint averments. The defendant also denied having borrowed any amount from the plaintiff or having executed any pronote and receipt for the same. The defendant alleged that he had been selling his agricultural produce through M/s. Jagroop Singh Lachhman Dass, Commission Agents. The said Commission Agents obtained thumb impressions/signatures of the defendant on blank/printed papers on the pretext of getting him bonus. Defendant filed suit for rendition of accounts against the said Commission Agents. The instan










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top