SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

L.N.MITTAL
Jagtar Singh – Appellant
Versus
Rajinder Kumar – Respondent


JUDGMENT (ORAL)

L.N. Mittal, J.—Defendant No.3 Jagtar Singh has filed this revision petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India assailing judgment dated 1.9.2010 (Annexure P2) passed by learned Additional District Judge, Ludhiana.

2. Respondent No.1 plaintiff Rajinder Kumar filed suit against Mukhtiar Singh (since deceased), his sons Didar Singh (defendant-respondent No. 2) and Jagtar Singh (defendant No.3 petitioner) for permanent injunction alleging that defendant No.1 agreed to sell the suit land to the plaintiff vide agreement dated 19.11.1994 and possession of the suit land was delivered to the plaintiff. The agreement was executed by defendant No.2 and was also signed by defendants No.1 and 3 as witnesses. Entire sale consideration was received by defendant No.2. The plaintiff, on the basis of his possession, sought permanent injunction restraining the defendants from dispossessing the plaintiff from the suit land. By moving separate application, plaintiff claimed temporary injunction to the same effect during pendency of the suit.

3. Defendants No.1 and 3 contested the suit and the application, whereas defendant No.2 was proceeded ex-parte.

4. Defendants No.1 and










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top