SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

SUNIL HALI
Sunil Wali – Appellant
Versus
Maharaj Krishan Raina – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioner:Mr. N.K. Atri, Advocate.
For the Respondent:Mr. P.N. Raina, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

Sunil Hali, J.—The petitioner filed a suit for permanent prohibitory injunction restraining the respondent from interfering with 10 marlas of land comprising in survey No. 59- min situated at village Dhomal Patta Bohri. It is averred that the plaintiff has purchased this land from the owner by virtue of sale deed dated 16-7.1999. On the other hand, respondent also claims to be in possession of 10 marlas of land situated in Khasra No 59- min at village Domal Tehsil and District Jammu. He also claims to have a sale deed executed in his favour in respect of the same land. The sale deed executed in favour of petitioner is dated 16-7-1999 whereas the sale deed executed in favour of respondent is dated 11-8-2003. Respondent claims to have raised plinth over the suit land and installed a hand pump on it.

2. The trial court vide order dated 28-1-2006 after considering the application for temporary injunction, directed the parties to maintain status quo till the disposal of civil suit.

3. An appeal has been preferred against the aforesaid order before the Additional District Judge, Jammu. The appellate court after hearing the parties, vide order dated 10-3-2008 declined the prayer of













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top