SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

PRAKASH TATIA
Shashi Surana – Appellant
Versus
Anant Mishra – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioner:Mr. R.K. Thanvi, Advocate.
For the Respondent:Mr. H.R. Soni, Advocate.

ORDER

Mahesh Chandra Sharma, J.—This civil first appeal has been filed under Section C)6 read with Order 21, Rule 103, CPC, against the order dated 15.09.2003 passed by Additional District Judge No.1 Jaipur City Jaipur in Civil Execution Misc.Appl.No.97 of 1999 whereby the appellant Vikram Singh’s (in short “the objection”) application filed under Order 2 I, Rule 97 was rejected.

2. Brief facts of the case as stated in the appeal are that on May 13, 1979 the objector took possession of four shops and open land appurtenant to them situated on Chomu Road, Jaipur on monthly rent of Rs.I1 0/- from the respondent No. 1 Prashant Sinha (in short “the decree holder”) and started his sanitary and hardware business. According to the objector the tenancy was verbal. The objector stated that the landlord dishonestly started taking steps in collusion with the Jaipur Development Authority in 1986 to dispossess the objector from the tenanted premises and the objector felt compelled to file a suit for permanent injunction on April 24, 1986 (No.395/86) against the landlord and the Jaipur Development Authority which was eventually decreed ill favour of the objector on 05.09.1995 and the landlord was p










































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top