SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
(JAIPUR BENCH)
Arun Mishra, C.J. and Prashan Kumar Agrawal, J.
Sajjan Kumar Agarwal and Ors. —Appellants
versus
Rent Control Appellate Tribunal
and Ors. —Respondents
D.B. Civil Special Appeal (Writ) No. 528 of 2011
Decided on 5.5.2011

Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Appellants:M.M. Ranjan, Sr. Advocate with Rajat Ranjan, Advocate.
For the Respondents:R.K. Agrawal, Sr. Advocate with Prateek Singh, Advocate.

IMPORTANT POINT
In case of joint tenancy notice to one of joint tenants is sufficient after death of original tenant.

Headnote:(i) Tenancy—Eviction—Rajasthan Rent Control Act, 2001—Section 21—Civil Procedure Code, 1908—Order 21 Rules 97 and 101 read with Section 151—In case of joint tenancy notice to one of joint tenants is sufficient after death of original tenant and suit for same reason is also good—It is not necessary to serve notice upon all joint tenants and to implead them—Notice under Section 106 of Transfer of Property Act served by appellant on respondent is a valid notice and suit must succeed—Appeal dismissed. (Paras 13 , 17 and 23)

       (ii) Constitution of India—Articles 226 and 227—Writ jurisdiction—A finding of fact should not ordinarily be interfered with by High Court in exercise of writ jurisdiction unless it is found that finding was vitiated by manifest error of law or is patently perverse—High Court should not interfere with findings of fact simply because it felt persuaded to take different view on materials on record. (Para 22)

       Result: Appeal dismissed.

JUDGMENT

Arun Mishra, C.J. —The intra-court appeal has been preferred as against the order of the Single Bench dated 22.2.2011 dismissing writ application No. 14833/2010, which was preferred against the order of the Appellate Rent Tribunal dated 23.10.2010 whereby appeal of the appellants was dismissed and the order of the Rent Tribunal dated 20.4.2010 rejecting application under Order 21, Rule 97 and 101 read with Section 151 CPC and Section 21 of the Rajasthan Rent Control Act, 2001, was affirmed.

2. Facts in short are that on 26.4.1984, late Chaturbhuj Agrawal, father of appellants, had taken shop in question on rent situated at M.I. Road, Jaipur from late Smt. Hajara Bai for business purposes. Thereafter, legal heirs and successors of late Smt. Hajara Bai sold the shop in question to Smt. Aanchi Devi vide registered sale deed dated 25.1.2003 and since then, she became owner of the shop in question and thus, rent for the month of February, 2003 to the tune of Rs. 651 was sent by the tenant. Mahendra Kumar Agrawal to landlord Smt. Aanchi Devi through cheque. However, the said cheque was dishonoured. Thereafter, notices were sent for payment of rent, but despite that, rent was not paid and thus, tenant has committed default in payment of rent for the period from 1.2.2003 to 31.5.2004 and on that ground, a petition for eviction was filed by landlord—Smt. Aanchi Devi against tenant Mahendra Kumar Agrawal on 2.6.2004 before the Rent Tribunal, Jaipur. The Rent Tribunal vide judgment and decree dated 11.4.2007 allowed the petition and ordered for eviction of tenant Mahendra Kumar Agrawal from the shop in question on the ground of committing default in making payment of rent. Aggrieved by the judgment and decree of the Rent Tribunal, appeal was preferred before the Appellate Rent Tribunal and the same was dismissed vide judgment dated 16.2.2010.

3. Thereafter, when the possession of the shop in question was not handed over by the tenant Mahendra Kumar Agrawal, execution petition was filed. During the pendency of the execution proceedings, an application under Order 21, Rules 97 and 101 read with Section 151 CPC and Section 21 of the Rajasthan Rent Control Act, 2001 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act of 2001”) was filed by the appellants raising objections that they were also co-tenants alongwith Mahendra Kumar Agarwal, but they were not made party to the eviction petition and therefore, order of eviction was not executable against them. A reply that application was filed on behalf of the landlord-Smt Aanchi Devi stating therein that after death of Chaturbhuj Agrawal, Mahendra Kumar Agrawal became the sole tenant as he was carrying on business in the shop in question. Apart from this, Mahendra Kumar Agrawal has also filed a civil suit against one Ayub Khan in which he has categorically stated that he was the sole tenant being proprietor of the business run in the shop in question. Even the cheque for payment of rent for the month of Feb. 2003 was also issued by Mahendra Kumar Agrawal. The Rent Tribunal vide order dated 20.4.2010 rejected the application of the appellants. Aggrieved thereby, appeal was filed, which was dismissed by the Appellate Rent Tribunal. Aggrieved by the order of Appellate Rent Tribunal, writ application was preferred and the same was also dismissed by the Single Bench. Hence, the intra-Court appeal has been preferred.

4. Mr. M.M. Ranjan, learned Senior Advocate with Mr. Rajat Ranjan appearing on behalf of the appellants has submitted that the appellants became joint tenants on death of late Chaturbhuj Agrawal and therefore, it was necessary to implead them in the proceedings of eviction. He has relied upon the decision of the Apex Court in Textile Association (India) Bombay Unit v. Balmohan Gopal Kurup & Anr. 1990 (4) SCC 700, in which decisions of the Apex Court in H.C. Pandey v. G.C. Paul AIR 1989 SC 1470 and Kanji Manji v. The Trustees of the Port of Bombay AIR 1963 SC 468, have been considered. The view



































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top