SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

RAJES KUMAR
Laxmi Devi – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioner:Mr. O.P. Lohia, Advocate.
For the Respondents: CSC.

JUDGMENT

Rajes Kumar, J.—Heard Sri O.P. Lohia, learned counsel for the petitioner.

2. By means of the present petition, the petitioner is challenging the order of the Additional District Judge, Jhansi, dated 23.3.2011 by which he has rejected the revision filed by the petitioner against the order of the Civil Judge, Junior Division, Jhansi dated 18.10.2010 by which he has rejected the application filed under Order 21, Rules 97 and 101 of the CPC.

3. The brief facts giving rise to the present case are that a suit being Suit No.301of 1966, for partition, was filed in respect of the properties detailed therein, which also included House Nos.227 and 228. In the said suit, the petitioner was also a party as a defendant. The said suit was decree and against the order of the Trial court, the appeal has also been dismissed. An Execution Case No.1 of 2004 was instituted.

4. It appears that the petitioner also filed a Suit No.53 of 2010 for injunction in respect of the property being House Nos.227 and 228 alongwith an application under Order 21, Rule 29 of the CPC. The said application was rejected. The petitioner filed Writ Petition No.57186 of 2010 in this Court. This Court vide order dated

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top