SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

VINEET KOTHARI
Vinod – Appellant
Versus
Sangeeta – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Appellant:Mr. N.K. Rastogi, Advocate.
For the Respondent:Mr. Abhishek Sharma, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

Vineet Kothari, J.—None present for the respondents despite service.

2. This appeal has been filed by the appellant-husband Mr. Vinod being aggrieved by the judgment of the District Judge, Pratapgarh District Chittorgarh rejecting his application under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act seeking divorce respondent from Smt. Sangeeta.

3. The brief facts of the case as per appellant are that the appellant-petitioner filed a divorce petition against the respondent for granting decree of divorce on the ground of cruelty. The respondent whenever lived with the appellant, she treated the appellant and his family persons with cruelty. She used to quarrel with the family members and use irony and filthy language and never paid respect and regards to the family members and oftenly caused damage to the property of the petitioner unnecessarily and by this fact the respondent created mental cruelty in the mind of appellant and she also not allowed the appellant to have a co-habitation and as such the CMA No.859/05-Vinod v. Smt. Sangeeta. Judgment dt.2.2.10 2/6 respondent created the mental cruelty and the life of the appellant become difficult and harden with the respondent. The respond













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top